diff options
author | Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org> | 2016-01-11 10:57:51 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org> | 2016-01-11 14:01:18 +0100 |
commit | 871080f333044ed6452c7a2f5a1c8cdc296c4f88 (patch) | |
tree | 7af813a1406e506a1726b231a8b1ac3ef649fbb9 /meeting-logs/20160110-summary.txt | |
parent | Add signed summary for Council meeting 2016-01-10 (diff) | |
download | council-871080f333044ed6452c7a2f5a1c8cdc296c4f88.tar.gz council-871080f333044ed6452c7a2f5a1c8cdc296c4f88.tar.bz2 council-871080f333044ed6452c7a2f5a1c8cdc296c4f88.zip |
Add signed summary for Council meeting 2016-01-10
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'meeting-logs/20160110-summary.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | meeting-logs/20160110-summary.txt | 75 |
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20160110-summary.txt b/meeting-logs/20160110-summary.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bb3a279 --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-logs/20160110-summary.txt @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +Summary of the Gentoo Council meeting 10 January 2016 + +Roll call +================= +Present: +blueness, dilfridge, jlec, k_f, rich0, ulm, williamh + + +1. Further discussion on GLEP 67 +================= +https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:67 +https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:67 +https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/637270936c9f07e3bd2f10ee45264a42 + +Michał Górny reported on the progress regarding GLEP 67. He has cleaned the +spec to make it more informative and updated the reference implementation +section for the most common software in use. + +Nearly all herds have been merged into existing or new projects, or have been +abandoned. + +Automated generation of projects.xml is already active on Gentoo Infrastructure. + +A short discussion about the mapping between projects and subprojects has +happened. It has been agreed on not definitely specifying the mapping being 1:n +or m:n in the GLEP right now. +The general consensus was that m:n mapping resembles the reality best and +missing support of that map style in tools like mediawiki is not sufficient +to nail the connectivity to 1:n. + +The Council approved GLEP 67 with wording from https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:M +Gorny/GLEP:67 as of 08:14, 10 January 2016 unanimously. + +The Council voted on the final deadline for the herds -> project migration +to be the 24th January 2016. All remaining herds will be dropped after that and +the remaining packages will be assigned to maintainer-needed. The vote passed +unanimously. + + +2. Banning of EAPI 0 & 3 for new ebuilds +================= +https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/bc0a1b7498c389bdbb0b0d52feb43391 +https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/6904e810caedf66d889458e6fd1cc552 + +The Council voted on banning EAPI 0 & 3 for new ebuilds and EAPI updates +in existing ebuilds. After some discussion an exception was made allowing +the security team and only the security team to do minor patching using +those EAPI levels. The decision was made unanimously. + +Further the Council decided unanimously to amend the ban of EAPI +1 & 2 made in the Council meeting 2014-03-11. To this effect, the +exception of updating EAPI=0 ebuilds to EAPI=1 is dropped. + + +3. Bugs with Council participation +================= +The Council briefly discussed bug 503382 again: "Missing summaries for +20131210, 20140114, and 20140225 Council meetings". Ulm had written the +final missing summary. The bug is fixed now. + +The Council briefly discussed bug 569914 & 571490: Missing meeting logs +for 20151025 and 20140225. Dilfridge is working on them. + +The Council voted on the NEWS item format 1.1, bug 568068. Format 1.1 allows +EAPI=5 style package dependency specification. Rich0 questioned the amount +of discussion with the community, but the general consensus was that the +public transparency for the size of the change has been enough. The Council +unanimously approved the new format. + + +4. Open floor +================= +A short information exchange about the presence of Gentoo Linux at the 2016 +FOSDEM has happened but further discussion has been moved to #gentoo-fosdem +@ freenode. |