summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRonny Gutbrod <gentoo@tastytea.de>2020-04-11 21:24:44 +0200
committerCraig Andrews <candrews@gentoo.org>2020-04-11 15:58:51 -0400
commitaa7da5ea0d4cf2d11be41b82ac64f80b2dfa9294 (patch)
tree7e49d2b0009f21ca4a4c2aea95eacfde75548e39 /sys-auth
parentdev-libs/libudfread: Read UDF from raw devices and image files (diff)
downloadgentoo-aa7da5ea0d4cf2d11be41b82ac64f80b2dfa9294.tar.gz
gentoo-aa7da5ea0d4cf2d11be41b82ac64f80b2dfa9294.tar.bz2
gentoo-aa7da5ea0d4cf2d11be41b82ac64f80b2dfa9294.zip
sys-auth/google-authenticator: Remove failing tests.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/624588 Signed-off-by: Ronny Gutbrod <gentoo@tastytea.de> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/15312 Signed-off-by: Craig Andrews <candrews@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'sys-auth')
-rw-r--r--sys-auth/google-authenticator/files/1.08-remove-failing-tests.patch301
-rw-r--r--sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-1.08.ebuild2
-rw-r--r--sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-9999.ebuild2
3 files changed, 303 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/sys-auth/google-authenticator/files/1.08-remove-failing-tests.patch b/sys-auth/google-authenticator/files/1.08-remove-failing-tests.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9b207dc20df7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sys-auth/google-authenticator/files/1.08-remove-failing-tests.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,301 @@
+From 9e26b1885250cb0b7a710d9ae65542e3fcae684f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Ronny Gutbrod <gentoo@tastytea.de>
+Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 21:08:37 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] Remove calls to pam_sm_authenticate().
+
+It tries to change the user id, which is prohibited by the sandbox. See #624588.
+---
+ tests/pam_google_authenticator_unittest.c | 271 ----------------------
+ 1 file changed, 271 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/tests/pam_google_authenticator_unittest.c b/tests/pam_google_authenticator_unittest.c
+index edade47..0661b8b 100644
+--- a/tests/pam_google_authenticator_unittest.c
++++ b/tests/pam_google_authenticator_unittest.c
+@@ -338,72 +338,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
+ // Make sure num_prompts_shown is still 0.
+ verify_prompts_shown(0);
+
+- // Set the timestamp that this test vector needs
+- set_time(10000*30);
+-
+- response = "123456";
+-
+- // Check if we can log in when using an invalid verification code
+- puts("Testing failed login attempt");
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Check required number of digits
+- if (conv_mode == TWO_PROMPTS) {
+- puts("Testing required number of digits");
+- response = "50548";
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+- response = "0050548";
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+- response = "00050548";
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+- }
+-
+- // Test a blank response
+- puts("Testing a blank response");
+- response = "";
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Set the response that we should send back to the authentication module
+- response = "050548";
+-
+- // Test handling of missing state files
+- puts("Test handling of missing state files");
+- const char *old_secret = targv[0];
+- targv[0] = "secret=/NOSUCHFILE";
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(password_is_provided_from_external ? 0 : expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+- targv[targc++] = "nullok";
+- targv[targc] = NULL;
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_IGNORE);
+- verify_prompts_shown(0);
+- targv[--targc] = NULL;
+- targv[0] = old_secret;
+-
+- // Check if we can log in when using a valid verification code
+- puts("Testing successful login");
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_SUCCESS);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Test the STEP_SIZE option
+- puts("Testing STEP_SIZE option");
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_APPEND | O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+- assert(write(fd, "\n\" STEP_SIZE 60\n", 16) == 16);
+- close(fd);
+- for (int *tm = (int []){ 9998, 9999, 10001, 10002, 10000, -1 },
+- *res = (int []){ PAM_AUTH_ERR, PAM_SUCCESS, PAM_SUCCESS,
+- PAM_AUTH_ERR, PAM_SUCCESS };
+- *tm >= 0;) {
+- set_time(*tm++ * 60);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == *res++);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- }
+-
+ // Reset secret file after step size testing.
+ assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+ assert((fd = open(fn, O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+@@ -411,211 +345,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
+ assert(write(fd, "\n\" TOTP_AUTH", 12) == 12);
+ close(fd);
+
+- // Test the WINDOW_SIZE option
+- puts("Testing WINDOW_SIZE option");
+- for (int *tm = (int []){ 9998, 9999, 10001, 10002, 10000, -1 },
+- *res = (int []){ PAM_AUTH_ERR, PAM_SUCCESS, PAM_SUCCESS,
+- PAM_AUTH_ERR, PAM_SUCCESS };
+- *tm >= 0;) {
+- set_time(*tm++ * 30);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == *res++);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- }
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_APPEND | O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+- assert(write(fd, "\n\" WINDOW_SIZE 6\n", 17) == 17);
+- close(fd);
+- for (int *tm = (int []){ 9996, 9997, 10002, 10003, 10000, -1 },
+- *res = (int []){ PAM_AUTH_ERR, PAM_SUCCESS, PAM_SUCCESS,
+- PAM_AUTH_ERR, PAM_SUCCESS };
+- *tm >= 0;) {
+- set_time(*tm++ * 30);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == *res++);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- }
+-
+- // Test the DISALLOW_REUSE option
+- puts("Testing DISALLOW_REUSE option");
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_SUCCESS);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_APPEND | O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+- assert(write(fd, "\" DISALLOW_REUSE\n", 17) == 17);
+- close(fd);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_SUCCESS);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Test that DISALLOW_REUSE expires old entries from the re-use list
+- char *old_response = response;
+- for (int i = 10001; i < 10008; ++i) {
+- set_time(i * 30);
+- char buf[7];
+- response = buf;
+- sprintf(response, "%06d", compute_code(binary_secret,
+- binary_secret_len, i));
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_SUCCESS);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- }
+- set_time(10000 * 30);
+- response = old_response;
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_RDONLY)) >= 0);
+- char state_file_buf[4096] = { 0 };
+- assert(read(fd, state_file_buf, sizeof(state_file_buf)-1) > 0);
+- close(fd);
+- const char *disallow = strstr(state_file_buf, "\" DISALLOW_REUSE ");
+- assert(disallow);
+- assert(!memcmp(disallow + 17,
+- "10002 10003 10004 10005 10006 10007\n", 36));
+-
+- // Test the RATE_LIMIT option
+- puts("Testing RATE_LIMIT option");
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_APPEND | O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+- assert(write(fd, "\" RATE_LIMIT 4 120\n", 19) == 19);
+- close(fd);
+- for (int *tm = (int []){ 20000, 20001, 20002, 20003, 20004, 20006, -1 },
+- *res = (int []){ PAM_SUCCESS, PAM_SUCCESS, PAM_SUCCESS,
+- PAM_SUCCESS, PAM_AUTH_ERR, PAM_SUCCESS, -1 };
+- *tm >= 0;) {
+- set_time(*tm * 30);
+- char buf[7];
+- response = buf;
+- sprintf(response, "%06d",
+- compute_code(binary_secret, binary_secret_len, *tm++));
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == *res);
+- verify_prompts_shown(
+- *res != PAM_SUCCESS ? 0 : expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- ++res;
+- }
+- set_time(10000 * 30);
+- response = old_response;
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_RDWR)) >= 0);
+- memset(state_file_buf, 0, sizeof(state_file_buf));
+- assert(read(fd, state_file_buf, sizeof(state_file_buf)-1) > 0);
+- const char *rate_limit = strstr(state_file_buf, "\" RATE_LIMIT ");
+- assert(rate_limit);
+- assert(!memcmp(rate_limit + 13,
+- "4 120 600060 600090 600120 600180\n", 35));
+-
+- // Test trailing space in RATE_LIMIT. This is considered a file format
+- // error.
+- char *eol = strchr(rate_limit, '\n');
+- *eol = ' ';
+- assert(!lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET));
+- assert(write(fd, state_file_buf, strlen(state_file_buf)) ==
+- strlen(state_file_buf));
+- close(fd);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(0);
+- assert(!strncmp(get_error_msg(),
+- "Invalid list of timestamps in RATE_LIMIT", 40));
+- *eol = '\n';
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+- assert(write(fd, state_file_buf, strlen(state_file_buf)) ==
+- strlen(state_file_buf));
+- close(fd);
+-
+- // Test TIME_SKEW option
+- puts("Testing TIME_SKEW");
+- for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+- set_time((12000 + i)*30);
+- char buf[7];
+- response = buf;
+- sprintf(response, "%06d",
+- compute_code(binary_secret, binary_secret_len, 11000 + i));
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) ==
+- (i >= 2 ? PAM_SUCCESS : PAM_AUTH_ERR));
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- }
+-
+- puts("Testing TIME_SKEW - noskewadj");
+- set_time(12020 * 30);
+- char buf[7];
+- response = buf;
+- sprintf(response, "%06d", compute_code(binary_secret,
+- binary_secret_len, 11010));
+- targv[targc] = "noskewadj";
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc+1, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- targv[targc] = NULL;
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+- set_time(10000*30);
+-
+- // Test scratch codes
+- puts("Testing scratch codes");
+- response = "12345678";
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_APPEND | O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+- assert(write(fd, "12345678\n", 9) == 9);
+- close(fd);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_SUCCESS);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Set up secret file for counter-based codes.
+- assert(!chmod(fn, 0600));
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY)) >= 0);
+- assert(write(fd, secret, sizeof(secret)-1) == sizeof(secret)-1);
+- assert(write(fd, "\n\" HOTP_COUNTER 1\n", 18) == 18);
+- close(fd);
+-
+- response = "293240";
+-
+- // Check if we can log in when using a valid verification code
+- puts("Testing successful counter-based login");
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_SUCCESS);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Verify that the hotp counter incremented
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_RDONLY)) >= 0);
+- memset(state_file_buf, 0, sizeof(state_file_buf));
+- assert(read(fd, state_file_buf, sizeof(state_file_buf)-1) > 0);
+- close(fd);
+- const char *hotp_counter = strstr(state_file_buf, "\" HOTP_COUNTER ");
+- assert(hotp_counter);
+- assert(!memcmp(hotp_counter + 15, "2\n", 2));
+-
+- // Check if we can log in when using an invalid verification code
+- // (including the same code a second time)
+- puts("Testing failed counter-based login attempt");
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_AUTH_ERR);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_bad_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Verify that the hotp counter incremented
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_RDONLY)) >= 0);
+- memset(state_file_buf, 0, sizeof(state_file_buf));
+- assert(read(fd, state_file_buf, sizeof(state_file_buf)-1) > 0);
+- close(fd);
+- hotp_counter = strstr(state_file_buf, "\" HOTP_COUNTER ");
+- assert(hotp_counter);
+- assert(!memcmp(hotp_counter + 15, "3\n", 2));
+-
+- response = "932068";
+-
+- // Check if we can log in using a future valid verification code (using
+- // default window_size of 3)
+- puts("Testing successful future counter-based login");
+- assert(pam_sm_authenticate(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == PAM_SUCCESS);
+- verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown);
+-
+- // Verify that the hotp counter incremented
+- assert((fd = open(fn, O_RDONLY)) >= 0);
+- memset(state_file_buf, 0, sizeof(state_file_buf));
+- assert(read(fd, state_file_buf, sizeof(state_file_buf)-1) > 0);
+- close(fd);
+- hotp_counter = strstr(state_file_buf, "\" HOTP_COUNTER ");
+- assert(hotp_counter);
+- assert(!memcmp(hotp_counter + 15, "6\n", 2));
+-
+- // Remove the temporarily created secret file
+- unlink(fn);
+-
+ // Release memory for the test arguments
+ for (int i = 0; i < targc; ++i) {
+ free((void *)targv[i]);
+--
+2.24.1
diff --git a/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-1.08.ebuild b/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-1.08.ebuild
index 9e10ede621f7..27600a569c7e 100644
--- a/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-1.08.ebuild
+++ b/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-1.08.ebuild
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ IUSE=""
DEPEND="sys-libs/pam"
RDEPEND="${DEPEND}"
-RESTRICT="test"
+PATCHES=( "${FILESDIR}/1.08-remove-failing-tests.patch" )
src_prepare() {
default
diff --git a/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-9999.ebuild b/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-9999.ebuild
index 9e10ede621f7..27600a569c7e 100644
--- a/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-9999.ebuild
+++ b/sys-auth/google-authenticator/google-authenticator-9999.ebuild
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ IUSE=""
DEPEND="sys-libs/pam"
RDEPEND="${DEPEND}"
-RESTRICT="test"
+PATCHES=( "${FILESDIR}/1.08-remove-failing-tests.patch" )
src_prepare() {
default