| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ia64"
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644146
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/614806
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Just like arm, we don't have Crypt-DBD keyworded yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<description/>
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7110
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/615726
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623084
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623000
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/622984
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/614968
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/616994
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/616954
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/614410
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/615590
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/614644
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/615106
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="hppa"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Remove embedded support
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/644174
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/598048
- removal from older versions may happen later
Upstream:
- Fix for CVE-2017-10788 ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/623632 )
- Fix for CVE-2017-10789 ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/623942 )
- Enforce SSL settings for BACKRONYM and Riddle
- Fix parsing of mysql_config --libs output in Configure
- Return INTs with ZEROFILL as strings
- Some fixes for 5.26-dot-in-inc
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/598048
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623632
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623942
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644174
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- add dependency to libtirpc
- add minimal test case
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644420
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/6845
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4
|