| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Drop unused eclass and fix description - it is not clear why this
should be targeted at specific desktop environments.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/641962
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Snapper's ext4 code does not work anymore.
So we need to compile with --disable-ext4 by default.
Also snapper does not seem to work without btrfs enabled, so we need to
enable it by default.
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7473
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7301
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649630
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7363
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7426
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --force
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648120
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See bug 644566 for more information
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the first version declared stable by upstream since 2.0.54.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Drop Qt4 deps and switch to using Qt5
- Switch to EAPI=6
Thanks Phil Stracchino (phils@caerllewys.net) for providing the critical
informations.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644566
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647058
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Upstream keeps chaning the upstream .deb file. This is very annoying.
Until we can figure out a better way of dealing with this, we'll only
make a -9999 version available. Users should be aware that each time
they emerge, they can get a different upstream version installed.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/645732
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644570
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Happy 2018!
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/6670
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/621362
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|