| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc64"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650146
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gnome-builder is an IDE, so move it alongside many other IDEs wrt category.
gnome-extra isn't a dumping ground for all slightly gnome related apps, but
rather more of a legacy deprecated "stuff didn't fit somewhere else in the
past" thing.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
RepoMan-Options: --force
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gnome-builder-3.24 was compatible with jedi 0.9 or older. Add patches to make
it compatible with 0.10.x instead, which is still available in main tree at least.
It is still incompatible with 0.11+
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
jedi plugin is broken, but that's incompatibility with jedi-0.10+, not
python version related. To be fixed in a revbump instead as I could
use it before I can get to 3.26 yet.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/633404
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix a number of test failures related to console execution missing
compat symlink. Down to 2 remaining errors, but this test suite is flaky
enough and its not a reason to hold up the stabilization any longer so
adding a RESTRICT=test for now
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649534
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648464
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/648464
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ia64"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7076
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
| |
No webkit-gtk:4 available right now for ~mips
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Translation updates.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|